Tuesday, October 20, 2009

ENGAGING LEARNERS WITH NEW STRATEGIES AND TOOLS

http://wenzel.wikispaces.com/8842+PROJECT

Above is the link to my wiki with the October 20, 2009 blog post graphic organizer

Anderson (2008) provided an overarching framework for a successful distance education experience. This framework includes the major categories of teacher presence, social presence, and cognitive presence. Anderson’s structure was utilized in the above graphic organizer and the work of others in this paper was inserted to demonstrate specific strategies and tools that could be successfully used to establish all three categories through instruction, establishment of the learning environment, and learning experiences.
Siemens (2008) discussed how learning networks have changed the structure of traditional institutions. The participative web added to communication and content development with new tools to gain information from. People now have a networked view of the world instead of a geographic view and networks provide more equity to learners given their access to information. He added that although the overwhelming amount of information available can make it difficult for learners to sift through it, the network tools can also provide assistance with this using blogs and online communities (Siemens (2007). Siemens (2008) added that there has been a disconnect between classroom tools and methods and the general society. Additionally, the increase in networked tools for learning has pressured education to change models better equipped for the interests and digital literacy skills of learners as well as fostering higher levels of learner engagement.
Siemens (2008) further argued that learning can be autonomous due to web tools and this meets to requirements of the constructivist model of teaching and learning used in distance education. As a result, the learner can be in control of the learning and an instructor is an expert who guides and encourages learner exploration. The instructors recognize the autonomy of learners and create resources that that give structure for critical ideas, concepts, papers, and places to create, explore, and connect knowledge. Instructional design has also changed so designers are also educators to educators in addition to their other tasks. Siemens (2007) also stated that instructors establish the core structure of resources for learners to explore without mandates on what they need to know. He argued that at this time, the goal for instructors is to achieve a centralized outcome through decentralized means.
Web tools that Siemens (2008) suggested fall into the categories of social sites or access to resources. Social sites such as Skype, blogs, social bookmarking, Ning, instant messaging, wikis, podcast, virtual worlds, and email include tools that create dialogue and disseminate information for learners. Google Scholar, Scopus, open access journals, and Wikipedia provide access to information. Other technological tools used by learners include cellular phones, computers, and internet all provide access for teaching and learning.
Siemens (2007) also discussed the web tools provide learners with new ways to communicate, collaborate, and explore information. Networks tools allow learners to be actively engaged in learning in different ways and from different sources from the older authoritative teaching in institutions. One example was that Skype can reduce barriers because it allows interaction and connection using voice and video in addition to asynchronous dialogue. Durrington, Berryhill, and Swafford (2006) added that high levels of interaction give learners more motivation, engagement, and learning. Some avenues that instructors can use to build this interaction are to provide a syllabus that sets the climate of the learning environment, create an area for learners to ask questions and instructors to answer, and instructors can use emoticons to add expression in postings. Additionally, asynchronous discussions, email, phone calls can be used between students and students with instructors to promote this interaction. Small groups can also be established for interaction prior to posting discussion as a means of promoting this essential interaction. Skype would be another good web tool for this purpose as it can add video for those learners who prefer this option.





 References
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Durrington, V., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING STUDENT INTERACTIVITY IN AN ONLINE ENVIRONMENT. College Teaching, 54(1), 190-193. http://search.ebscohost.com
Siemens, G. (2007). Curatorial Teaching. Podcast.
.

4 comments:

  1. Hi!
    The social networking innovations for online, which do you think is best? Do you have a preference?

    I'm currently trying to find one that is super friendly to use with my students, one that is not complex.

    Ginger Harper

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ginger,
    Weebly is a good option: http://education.weebly.com/
    another new option is: Google wave http://wave.google.com/help/wave/closed.html
    Orit

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sandy, fantastic post! I really like how you set up your graphic organizer. One thing I would like to add is how refreshing it is to be in charge of your own learning. I do like having a fair amount of structure to a course, but only in regards to when assignments are due.

    I can compare and contrast the design of the two courses I am taking now by looking at all of the factors in this module and by doing so I am getting the big picture of what all these theorists are talking about. Do you feel like you are learning a lot? I do! Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sandy,

    You wrote that high level of interaction motivates and engages the learner. This is true in both a traditional and online education.
    In online education, the connection and the interaction between the student and the instructor can be a defining factor in student success and retention.

    Orit

    ReplyDelete